Trump skates on thin ice regarding his ties to pedo prince Andrew

Daily Mail [UK] –
Donald Trump DENIES knowing Prince Andrew despite chatting with him on state visit THIS YEAR and being pictured with him and Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach in 2000

Trump was grilled by reporters at a press conference at Winfield House today

“. . . But the US leader was photographed smiling and shaking hands with Andrew, 59, at Westminster Abbey and Buckingham Palace during his state visit to London in June. “
” . . . Other images of Trump and Andrew together include one at Buckingham Palace where he also met former Prime Minister Theresa May.”

This may become extra dicey as we watch Hillary Clinton avoid this TNT on Trump since Bill is ten times more implicated in the Epstein pedo ring!
[ – opinion]

.

21 thoughts on “Trump skates on thin ice regarding his ties to pedo prince Andrew

  1. flyingcuttlefish December 3, 2019 / 5:56 pm

    Like

  2. flyingcuttlefish December 3, 2019 / 6:05 pm

    Like

  3. miningawareness December 3, 2019 / 7:35 pm

    Do you have a pdf of the email that has topped the news today between Ghislaine and Andrew?
    Trump brings to mind Clinton’s “I did not have s*x with that woman”…. what is “to know” whether King James Bible or other.

    Like

    • flyingcuttlefish December 3, 2019 / 7:50 pm

      I do not have a PDF.
      But here is an image:
      https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/10469504/prince-andrew-ghislaine-maxwell-virginia/

      I put that link as a comment in this post:

      The Big Lie – pedo-prince Andrew met Epstein way before he claimed in train-wreck, BBC interview

      I expect the e-mail was included in one of the document dumps on the case (maybe Giuffre v. Maxwell case) … but it’s a lot of files to slog thru.
      Some links in the Research page on 971 blog.

      Like

      • miningawareness December 3, 2019 / 8:14 pm

        Thanks! I think you are the only one who has gone through the information to know what’s in there, apart apparently one journalist.

        Like

      • flyingcuttlefish December 3, 2019 / 10:59 pm

        I am on it tonight. Not hard to skim through as e-mails look different than transcripts and the exhibit pages are clustered.
        I will also blog it if I find it.
        Some lazy (or worse) journos are falsely reporting the e-mail as a “leaked” e-mail. It is no such thing. It is part of the court exhibits – legally released to the public.

        Liked by 1 person

      • miningawareness December 4, 2019 / 1:03 am

        Thanks! I am too tired and am having to throw in the towel early! This is an important point, too, for reuse – part of the court exhibit it is public record, as well as official like you say.

        Like

      • flyingcuttlefish December 4, 2019 / 1:43 am

        Well … it isn’t in the papers from the Giuffre v. Maxwell defamation case. Shoot.
        Must be from other case … I am looking ….
        it might be on scribed.com

        Liked by 1 person

      • miningawareness December 4, 2019 / 11:58 pm

        There are a few sites where it might be free. I will look. One that is free is called Plain site org

        Like

    • flyingcuttlefish December 3, 2019 / 8:07 pm

      this document is all about Jane Doe #3 …
      I am skimming thru
      Case 18-2868, Document 278, 08/09/2019, 2628230

      Liked by 1 person

  4. flyingcuttlefish December 4, 2019 / 3:10 am
    • flyingcuttlefish December 5, 2019 / 6:09 am

      yes, but they don’t have document 36-10. I am waiting on an inquiry reply from a source for a link.

      Liked by 1 person

  5. flyingcuttlefish August 4, 2020 / 6:15 pm

    Like

Leave a comment