Judiciary Sides with Pedos Yet Again – U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra Kicks Victims in the Face

flyingcuttlefish

Miami Herald – Jeffrey Epstein’s sex victims turn to appeals court after judge denies relief

“A South Florida woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein of sexually assaulting her when she was a girl is urging a federal appeals court to provide relief to multiple victims like herself who were not notified of a “sweetheart” prosecution deal with the wealthy financier.”

” . . . “The district court’s ruling turns [the Crime Victims’ Relief Act] into a hollow promise for victims and should be overturned,” attorney Paul Cassell wrote on behalf of Wild.

The new petition is challenging U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra’s decision that Wild and others are not eligible for any major relief, even though he found federal prosecutors violated the rights of Epstein’s victims by leaving them in the dark about his non-prosecution agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Miami.”

F-tard judiciary there in Florida. As f-tard as the NY jail system…

15 thoughts on “Judiciary Sides with Pedos Yet Again – U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra Kicks Victims in the Face”

  1. flyingcuttlefish October 3, 2019 / 6:13 am

    Mother Jones – An Actual Conspiracy Kept Jeffrey Epstein’s Accomplices out of Prison
    https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2019/10/an-actual-conspiracy-kept-jeffrey-epsteins-accomplices-out-of-prison/

    “… “That was designed to protect any women who Epstein had get other women,” said Dershowitz. Another member of the 2007 defense team described the provision as a way to “protect” the dozens of young girls who were victims of Epstein’s sexual abuse but who had also accepted money to recruit other girls, often from high school house parties.

    “That is complete and utter crap,” Kuvin said. “Absolutely not true.” Kuvin believed the provision was crafted to protect people like Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite and longtime Epstein confidant accused of soliciting girls on the financier’s behalf. “They wrote that provision in to be as broad as possible because he wanted to capture, in that plea deal, all of his direct co-conspirators, like Ghislaine Maxwell,” Kuvin went on. “If they wanted to exclude any girls from prosecution, the government could’ve done that. They interviewed over 40 women, and they knew the names of all those women.” “

    Like

    Reply
  4. flyingcuttlefish October 11, 2019 / 1:07 pm

    Another judge we have no use for, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Doris Ling-Cohan.

    “Disgraced television journalist Charlie Rose allegedly hurling F-bombs at his employees cannot legally be considered retaliation in the sexual harassment lawsuit filed against him, a judge ruled Thursday.”

    https://pagesix.com/2019/10/10/charlie-rose-allegedly-dropping-f-bombs-on-staff-not-retaliation-for-sex-harassment-suit-judge/

    (normally creating a hostile workplace is actionable in NY state)

    Like

    Reply
    • flyingcuttlefish September 14, 2021 / 11:07 am

      Like

      Reply

Leave a comment